ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of local and systemic zoledronic acid in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone.Methods:The clinical data of 42 patients with giant cell tumor of bone who were treated in the Department of Joint and Sports Medicine Surgery of Shandong Provincial Third Hospital from January 2000 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether zoledronic acid was used during and after operation, the patients were divided into zoledronic acid group ( n=21) and non zoledronic acid group ( n=21). The perioperative indexes, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), international Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of lower extremity function, adverse reactions and the postoperative recurrence were compared between the two groups. Results:The operative time of zoledronic acid group and non zoledronic acid group were (158.4±20.5) min and (169.5±19.5) min, the intraoperative bleeding volume were (236.3±9.7) ml and (228.2±16.5) ml, the postoperative drainage volume were (163.3±7.4) ml and (161.4±9.3) ml, and the healing time of incision were (13.8±2.1) d and (14.0±2.0) d, respectively, with no significant difference ( t=-1.798, P=0.080; t=1.936, P=0.062; t=0.733, P=0.468; t=-0.290, P=0.774). The preoperative VAS scores of zoledronic acid group and non zoledronic acid group were 6.54±1.76 and 6.72±1.51 respectively, the MSTS scores were 13.56±2.35 and 12.79±1.98 respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant ( t=-0.356, P=0.724; t=1.148, P=0.258). The VAS scores of the two groups were 1.32±0.31 and 1.92±0.19 at 4 weeks after operation, 0.93±0.29 and 1.47±0.38 at 3 months after operation respectively, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=-7.562, P<0.001; t=-5.177, P<0.001). The VAS scores of the two groups were 0.31±0.12 and 0.35±0.23 at the last follow-up, with no significant difference ( t=0.707, P=0.485). The MSTS scores of zoledronic acid group and non zoledronic acid group were 24.89±3.86 and 21.82±2.95 at 4 weeks after operation, 26.78±2.57 and 24.62±2.62 at 3 months after operation respectively, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=2.896, P=0.006; t=2.697, P=0.010). The MSTS scores of the two groups were 27.31±2.21 and 26.69±2.93 at the last follow-up, with no significant difference ( t=0.774, P=0.443). The postoperative recurrence time of the two groups was (9.79±2.58) months and (7.31±1.73) months respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=3.659, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in recurrence Campanacci grade and recurrence tumor location between the two groups ( U=7.000, P=0.860; χ2=1.062, P>0.999). The occurrence rates of fever in zoledronic acid group and non zoledronic acid group were 23.81% (5/21) and 4.76% (1/21), the occurrence rates of myalgia were 19.05% (4/21) and 4.76% (1/21), the incidences of influenza like symptoms were 14.29% (3/21) and 0 (0/21), the occurrence rates of gastrointestinal reaction were 9.52% (2/21) and 4.76 (1/21), and the differences were not statistically significant ( χ2=1.750, P=0.186; χ2=0.980, P=0.341; χ2=1.436, P=0.231; χ2<0.001, P>0.999). All the patients had no serious adverse reactions such as liver and kidney function damage and mandible necrosis. Conclusion:Local and systemic application of zoledronic acid in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone can improve the early postoperative pain and limb function, delay the recurrence time, and can be used as an auxiliary treatment of giant cell tumor of bone.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) by prospective clinical study. Methods: Between June 2015 and June 2018, 180 patients with KOA met the inclusion criteria were included in study and randomly allocated to group A (n=60), group B (n=60), and group C (n=60). The patients were treated with autologous PRP intra-articular injection in group A, extracorporeal shock wave therapy in group B, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with autologous PRP intra-articular injection in group C, once a week and 5 times a duration of treatment. There was no significant difference in age, gender, disease duration, side of KOA, and Kellgren-Lawrence grading between groups (P>0.05). The pain and function of knee joint were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Lequesne Index score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and knee joint activity before treatment and at 1, 3, and 5 weeks after the first treatment. Results: There were significant differences in VAS score, Lequesne Index score, WOMAC score, and knee joint activity between pre- and post-treatment in all groups (P0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS score, Lequesne Index score, WOMAC score, and knee joint activity between groups before treatment (P>0.05); the scores of group C were superior to groups A and B (P0.05). Conclusion: The extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with PRP injection can relieve the pain synergistically for KOA.